Tomáš Urfus

1.2k citations
43 papers · 889 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Tomáš Urfus

41 papers receiving 863 citations

Peers

Tomáš Urfus
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 473
  • Plant Science 627
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 75
  • Genetics 141
  • Molecular Biology 261
Replace Petr Vít with:
Petr Vít Czechia
Mariana Castro Portugal
Christian Raquin France
Wayne J. Elisens United States
Eva Wallander Sweden
Anna Krahulcová Czechia
Simon P. Vaughan United Kingdom
L. L. DeVerno Canada
Václav Mahelka Czechia
Ana Lilia Alzate‐Marin Brazil
Tomáš Urfus relative to Petr Vít Czechia Petr Vít's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Petr Vít · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tomáš Urfus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tomáš Urfus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomáš Urfus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomáš Urfus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tomáš Urfus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomáš Urfus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomáš Urfus. The network helps show where Tomáš Urfus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tomáš Urfus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tomáš Urfus Line = papers co-authored together Tomáš Urfus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009114
2 201376
3 200773
4
The use of flow cytometry in the biosystematics, ecology and population biology of homoploid plants.
201072
5 201553
6 202146
7 201545
8 200942
9 201335
10 201434
11 201133
12 201332
13 201824
14 201324
15 201921
16 201921
17 201816
18
Interspecific hybridization between rare and common plant congeners inferred from genome size data: assessing the threat to the Czech serpentine endemic Cerastium alsinifolium.
201414
19 201714
20 202011

About Tomáš Urfus

Tomáš Urfus is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 43 papers that have together received 889 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (15 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (14 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (6 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (5 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (5 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (4 papers) and Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (473 citations), Plant Science (627 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (75 citations), Genetics (141 citations) and Molecular Biology (261 citations). Tomáš Urfus has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Slovakia and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Petr Vít, Jan Suda, Pavel Trávníček, Filip Kolář, František Krahulec, Jana Rauchová, Milan Štech, Patrik Mráz, Jana Jersáková and Barbora Šingliarová. Their work appears in journals such as Preslia, Annals of Botany, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Cytometry Part A and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact