Martin Čertner

829 citations
21 papers · 506 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Martin Čertner

21 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers

Martin Čertner
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 190
  • Plant Science 313
  • Genetics 146
  • Molecular Biology 178
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 30
Replace Shih‐Ying Hwang with:
Shih‐Ying Hwang Taiwan
Michael Gruenstaeudl Germany
Rose A. Marks United States
Tadashi Yamashiro Japan
Milan Štech Czechia
Khatere Emadzade Austria
Evangeline S. Ballerini United States
Jaromír Kučera Slovakia
Zhenhua Guo China
Salvatore Tomasello Germany
Martin Čertner relative to Shih‐Ying Hwang Taiwan Shih‐Ying Hwang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Shih‐Ying Hwang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Martin Čertner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Martin Čertner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martin Čertner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martin Čertner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Martin Čertner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martin Čertner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martin Čertner. The network helps show where Martin Čertner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Martin Čertner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Martin Čertner Line = papers co-authored together Martin Čertner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017168
2 201958
3 201755
4 201828
5 201824
6 202120
7 202119
8 202017
9 201517
10 201916
11 201915
12 202315
13 202114
14 202111
15 20227
16 20197
17 20244
18 20224
19 20233
20 20223

About Martin Čertner

Martin Čertner is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 21 papers that have together received 506 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (8 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (7 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (7 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (3 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (190 citations), Plant Science (313 citations), Genetics (146 citations), Molecular Biology (178 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (30 citations). Martin Čertner has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Filip Kolář, Jan Suda, Peter Schönswetter, Brian C. Husband, Zuzana Chumová, Pavel Trávníček, Jan Ponert, Petr Koutecký, Jana Jersáková and Magdalena Lučanová. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics, Cytometry Part A, Annals of Botany and The Plant Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact