Tomáš Fér

1.6k citations
47 papers · 1.3k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Tomáš Fér

44 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Tomáš Fér
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Pharmacology 224
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 476
  • Plant Science 541
  • Molecular Medicine 69
  • Genetics 332
Replace Linda M. Prince with:
Linda M. Prince United States
Karol Krak Czechia
Eliška Záveská Czechia
Jeremy J. Bruhl Australia
Gregory M. Plunkett United States
Leonid V. Averyanov Russia
Ze‐Long Nie China
Carlos M. Baeza Chile
Florian Jabbour France
Marie‐Stéphanie Samain Mexico
Tomáš Fér relative to Linda M. Prince United States Linda M. Prince's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Linda M. Prince · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tomáš Fér

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tomáš Fér's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomáš Fér with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomáš Fér more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tomáš Fér

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomáš Fér. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomáš Fér. The network helps show where Tomáš Fér may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tomáš Fér, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tomáš Fér Line = papers co-authored together Tomáš Fér links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006160
2 2007154
3 201279
4 201873
5 201863
6 201254
7
Genome size correlates with growth form, habitat and phylogeny in the Andean genus Lasiocephalus (Asteraceae).
201053
8 201853
9 200844
10 200541
11 201040
12 200836
13 201333
14 201931
15 201626
16 200824
17 201724
18 201123
19 201023
20 202222

About Tomáš Fér

Tomáš Fér is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Pharmacology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic diversity and population structure (16 papers), Ginger and Zingiberaceae research (8 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (8 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (7 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (7 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (224 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (476 citations), Plant Science (541 citations), Molecular Medicine (69 citations) and Genetics (332 citations). Tomáš Fér has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Singapore and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jana Leong‐Škorničková, Karol Marhold, Roswitha Schmickl, Jan Suda, Zdenka Hroudová, Pavel Trávníček, Philipp M. Schlüter, Martin Pfosser, Tod F. Stuessy and Byung‐Yun Sun. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Taxon, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Preslia and Plant Systematics and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact