Cytometry Part A

2.3k papers and 64.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Cytometry Part A in the last decades have received a total of 64.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Cytometry Part A usually cover Molecular Biology (1.2k papers), Biophysics (643 papers) and Immunology (508 papers) specifically the topics of Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (578 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (499 papers) and Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (248 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cytometry Part A are Mario Roederer, Erik Meijering, Zbigniew Darżynkiewicz, Ingela Parmryd, Jeremy Adler, Garry P. Nolan, Stuart M. Stocks, Attila Tárnok, Holden T. Maecker and Peter O. Krutzik.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cytometry Part A

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cytometry Part A. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cytometry Part A.

Countries where authors publish in Cytometry Part A

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cytometry Part A. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cytometry Part A with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cytometry Part A more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025