Libor Ekrt

836 citations
33 papers · 651 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Libor Ekrt

31 papers receiving 617 citations

Peers

Libor Ekrt
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 243
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 137
  • Plant Science 333
  • Ecological Modeling 7
  • Ecology 43
Replace Gergely Király with:
Gergely Király Hungary
Liliana Essi Brazil
Gwen J. Harden Australia
Gabriel Blanca Spain
Giovanni Astuti Italy
Angelo Troìa Italy
Eduardo Estrada‐Castillón Mexico
Peter W. Ball Canada
João Marcelo Alvarenga Braga Brazil
Pilar Soriano Spain
Libor Ekrt relative to Gergely Király Hungary Gergely Király's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Gergely Király · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Libor Ekrt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Libor Ekrt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Libor Ekrt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Libor Ekrt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Libor Ekrt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Libor Ekrt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Libor Ekrt. The network helps show where Libor Ekrt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Libor Ekrt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Libor Ekrt Line = papers co-authored together Libor Ekrt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Klíč ke květeně České republiky
2002138
2 201954
3 201852
4 201848
5 201035
6 201435
7 201526
8 202126
9 201825
10 202123
11
Vegetace České republiky 3. Vodní a mokřadní vegetace
201121
12 202420
13 201719
14 201918
15 202018
16 201717
17 201716
18 201914
19 201912
20 20206

About Libor Ekrt

Libor Ekrt is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Biochemistry, History and Philosophy of Science and Food Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fern and Epiphyte Biology (19 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (10 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (3 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (2 papers), Linguistic and Cultural Studies (1 paper), Seed and Plant Biochemistry (1 paper), Food and Agricultural Sciences (1 paper) and Philosophy and History of Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (243 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (137 citations), Plant Science (333 citations), Ecological Modeling (7 citations) and Ecology (43 citations). Libor Ekrt has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Petr Koutecký, Zdeněk Kaplan, Jan Wild, Jiří Danihelka, Tomáš Urfus, Kateřina Šumberová, Jan Suda, Pavel Trávníček, Michal Ducháček and Jiří Košnar. Their work appears in journals such as Preslia, American Journal of Botany, Annals of Botany, Plant Systematics and Evolution and Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact