Tom O’Shea

31 papers receiving 351 citations

Peers

Tom O’Shea
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Computer Science Applications 31
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 61
  • Political Science and International Relations 84
  • Ecological Modeling 11
  • Philosophy 28
Replace Nathan A. Burroughs with:
Nathan A. Burroughs United States
Milton Rosa Brazil
Anthony Lelliott South Africa
David Martins Brazil
Daniel Clark Orey Brazil
John Davy United Kingdom
Liz Campbell United Kingdom
Matthew Weinstein United States
Jing Lin China
Joachim Allgaier Germany
Tom O’Shea relative to Nathan A. Burroughs United States Nathan A. Burroughs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Nathan A. Burroughs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom O’Shea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom O’Shea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom O’Shea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom O’Shea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom O’Shea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom O’Shea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom O’Shea. The network helps show where Tom O’Shea may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Tom O’Shea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom O’Shea Line = papers co-authored together Tom O’Shea links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201957
2
Survival estimation in bats: historical overview, critical appraisal, and suggestions for new approaches
200443
3 199242
4 199536
5 199130
6 199625
7 201523
8 201320
9 199720
10 201917
11 199715
12 19948
13 20137
14 20207
15 19936
16 20126
17 19966
18 20185
19 20225
20 20204

About Tom O’Shea

Tom O’Shea is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Computer Science Applications, Law, Accounting and Philosophy, having authored 34 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (10 papers), Taxation and Legal Issues (4 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (4 papers), Ethics in medical practice (4 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (4 papers), Political Theory and Influence (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers) and Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (31 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (61 citations), Political Science and International Relations (84 citations), Ecological Modeling (11 citations) and Philosophy (28 citations). Tom O’Shea has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Thomas R. Stanley, Laura E. Ellison, Fabian Freyenhagen, Susan M. Lunte, Martin Telting‐Diaz, Pat Fung, Craig E. Lunte, M. R. Smyth, Ann C. Jones and Sara Hennessy. Their work appears in journals such as Political Theory, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, International Journal of Science Education, Journal of Applied Philosophy and International Journal of Law in Context.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact