Tom McKlin

63 papers receiving 963 citations

Peers

Tom McKlin
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Computer Science Applications 714
  • Gender Studies 278
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 298
  • Human-Computer Interaction 103
  • Media Technology 118
Replace Lecia Barker with:
Lecia Barker United States
Sue Sentance United Kingdom
Barbara Ericson United States
Colleen M. Lewis United States
Quinn Burke United States
Irene Lee United States
Danielle B. Harlow United States
Christina Gardner‐McCune United States
Briana B. Morrison United States
Charlie McDowell United States
Tom McKlin relative to Lecia Barker United States Lecia Barker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Lecia Barker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom McKlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom McKlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom McKlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom McKlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom McKlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom McKlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom McKlin. The network helps show where Tom McKlin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom McKlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom McKlin Line = papers co-authored together Tom McKlin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201278
2 201467
3 201662
4 200960
5 201455
6 201454
7 200151
8 201250
9 201144
10 201744
11 201329
12 200924
13 201823
14 201420
15 201320
16 201919
17 201019
18 201918
19 201818
20 200917

About Tom McKlin

Tom McKlin is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Gender Studies and Information Systems, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (39 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (19 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (18 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (12 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (11 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (10 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (714 citations), Gender Studies (278 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (298 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (103 citations) and Media Technology (118 citations). Tom McKlin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Ericson, Mark Guzdial, Brian Magerko, Jason Freeman, Betsy DiSalvo, Amy Bruckman, Lijun Ni, Sarita Yardi, William Evans and Matthew G. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Computing Education, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Science Education, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education and Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact