Tom Decorte

97 papers receiving 964 citations

Peers

Tom Decorte
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Pharmacology 443
  • Toxicology 54
  • Epidemiology 398
  • Clinical Psychology 200
  • General Health Professions 192
Replace Gary Potter with:
Gary Potter United Kingdom
Stephen J. Sifaneck United States
Pekka Hakkarainen Finland
Anne Line Bretteville‐Jensen Norway
Eric L. Sevigny United States
Paul J. Turnbull United Kingdom
Bernd Werse Germany
Vibeke Asmussen Frank Denmark
Ellen Benoit United States
Robert Ralphs United Kingdom
Tom Decorte relative to Gary Potter United Kingdom Gary Potter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Gary Potter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Decorte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Decorte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Decorte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Decorte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Decorte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Decorte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Decorte. The network helps show where Tom Decorte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Decorte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Decorte Line = papers co-authored together Tom Decorte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 108 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201768
2 201064
3 201456
4 200155
5 201451
6 201444
7 201940
8 200139
9 201039
10 201439
11 201230
12
The taming of cocaine: cocaine use in European and American cities
200029
13
Kwalitatieve methoden en technieken in de criminologie
201027
14 201822
15 201819
16 201719
17
Pleasure, pain and profit: European perspectives on drugs
201018
18 201618
19 202017
20 201817

About Tom Decorte

Tom Decorte is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Education, Epidemiology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 108 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (32 papers), Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (28 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (21 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (17 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (14 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (7 papers), Legal and Social Justice Studies (6 papers) and Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (443 citations), Toxicology (54 citations), Epidemiology (398 citations), Clinical Psychology (200 citations) and General Health Professions (192 citations). Tom Decorte has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mafalda Pardal, Gary Potter, Simon Lenton, Pekka Hakkarainen, Monica J. Barratt, Vibeke Asmussen Frank, Martin Bouchard, Bernd Werse, Aili Malm and Damián Zaitch. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Drug Policy, Methodological Innovations, Journal of Drug Issues, Contemporary Drug Problems and Drug and Alcohol Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact