John Scott

4.9k citations
143 papers · 2.7k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

John Scott

127 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

John Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.3k
  • Gender Studies 270
  • Public Administration 97
  • Health 121
  • Accounting 184
Replace Sarah Richardson with:
Sarah Richardson United Kingdom
David Bell United Kingdom
David de Vaus Australia
John D. Hillebrand
Melissa A. Hardy United States
Thomas B. Pepinsky United States
Drew A. Linzer United States
Yana van der Meulen Rodgers United States
David Figlio United States
Carol A. Heimer United States
John Scott relative to Sarah Richardson United Kingdom Sarah Richardson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Sarah Richardson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Scott. The network helps show where John Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Scott Line = papers co-authored together John Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 143 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009223
2 2000201
3
Networks Of Corporate Power: A Comparative Analysis Of Ten Countries
1985125
4 1981101
5 201896
6 201391
7 201085
8 201379
9 198277
10 198066
11 200361
12 201457
13 201354
14 200346
15 201843
16 200342
17 198541
18 201540
19 201339
20 200338

About John Scott

John Scott is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Epidemiology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 143 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sex work and related issues (17 papers), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (13 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (13 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (11 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (9 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (8 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (6 papers) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (1.3k citations), Gender Studies (270 citations), Public Administration (97 citations), Health (121 citations) and Accounting (184 citations). John Scott has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gordon Marshall, Victor Minichiello, Kerry Carrington, Russell Hogg, Colin Crouch, Alison McIntosh, Denton Callander, Frans N. Stokman, Rolf Ziegler and S. D. Berkowitz. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Sociology, American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, The Canadian Journal of Sociology, Culture Health & Sexuality and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact