John Scott

4.9k citations
190 papers · 3.2k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

John Scott

160 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

John Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.6k
  • Gender Studies 327
  • Public Administration 108
  • Health 142
  • Accounting 193
Replace Steven Raphael with:
Steven Raphael United States
Sarah Richardson United Kingdom
Raymond M. Lee United Kingdom
Geoff Payne United Kingdom
Pat O’Malley Australia
Marie Withers Osmond United States
David Bell United Kingdom
John Broome United Kingdom
Carol A. Heimer United States
Jeffrey Grogger United States
John Scott relative to Steven Raphael United States Steven Raphael's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Steven Raphael · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Scott. The network helps show where John Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Scott Line = papers co-authored together John Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 190 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009253
2 2000250
3
Networks Of Corporate Power: A Comparative Analysis Of Ten Countries
1985151
4 1981117
5 2018106
6 201098
7 201398
8 201384
9 198282
10 198072
11 200365
12 201364
13 201463
14 200349
15 201848
16 201846
17 200345
18 201144
19 201944
20 198544

About John Scott

John Scott is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Political Science and International Relations and Gender Studies, having authored 190 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sex work and related issues (33 papers), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (19 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (19 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (13 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (13 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (12 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (9 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (1.6k citations), Gender Studies (327 citations), Public Administration (108 citations), Health (142 citations) and Accounting (193 citations). John Scott has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gordon Marshall, Victor Minichiello, Kerry Carrington, Russell Hogg, Colin Crouch, Alison McIntosh, Denton Callander, Frans N. Stokman, Rolf Ziegler and Máximo Sozzo. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Sociology, Culture Health & Sexuality, International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy, American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal and Journal of sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact