Countries where authors publish in Methodological Innovations
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Methodological Innovations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Methodological Innovations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Methodological Innovations more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Methodological Innovations
This network shows the impact of papers published in Methodological Innovations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Methodological Innovations.
About Methodological Innovations
The 262 papers published in Methodological Innovations in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Methodological Innovations usually cover Sociology and Political Science (150 papers), Public Administration (10 papers), General Social Sciences (9 papers), Conservation (9 papers) and General Health Professions (43 papers) specifically the topics of Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (39 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (29 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (16 papers), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (15 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (12 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (12 papers), Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research (11 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (11 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Methodological Innovations are André Berchtold, Michael D. Fetters, Leanne M. Kelly, Ellen Moseholm, Roxanne Connelly, Vernon Gayle, Paul Lambert, Paolo Campana, Martin A. Andresen and Petra Ahrens.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.