Thomas Petit
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Microbial Metabolism and Applications
- Biochemistry top 5%
Papers in
-
- Fungal and yeast genetics research 9
- Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction 8
-
- Microbial Metabolism and Applications 8
- Biochemical and biochemical processes 5
- Co-authors
- Yanis Caro (25 shared papers)Carlos Gancedo (8 shared papers)Carmen‐Lisset Flores (2 shared papers)Laurent Dufossé (8 shared papers)Cristina Rodrı́guez (1 shared paper)Isabelle Grondin (5 shared papers)Mireille Fouillaud (4 shared papers)Juliana Lebeau (7 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Thomas Petit
84 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Biotechnology 268
- Biochemistry 103
- Food Science 239
- Pharmacology 164
- Molecular Biology 596
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Petit
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Petit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Petit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Petit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Petit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Petit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Petit. The network helps show where Thomas Petit may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Petit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 175 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 123 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 104 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 91 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 59 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 59 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 49 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 47 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 45 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 39 | |
| 12 | 1993 | 39 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 38 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 32 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 31 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 27 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 26 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 21 |
About Thomas Petit
Thomas Petit is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Plant Science, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 88 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fungal and yeast genetics research (9 papers), Microbial Metabolism and Applications (8 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (8 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (8 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (7 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (7 papers), Biochemical and biochemical processes (5 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (268 citations), Biochemistry (103 citations), Food Science (239 citations), Pharmacology (164 citations) and Molecular Biology (596 citations). Thomas Petit has collaborated with scholars based in France, Réunion and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Yanis Caro, Carlos Gancedo, Carmen‐Lisset Flores, Laurent Dufossé, Cristina Rodrı́guez, Isabelle Grondin, Mireille Fouillaud, Juliana Lebeau, Jean François and Philippe Laurent. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology, Blood, Cancer Research and FEBS Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.