Countries where authors publish in Journal of Fungi
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Fungi. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Fungi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Fungi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Fungi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Fungi.
About Journal of Fungi
The 5.8k papers published in Journal of Fungi in the last decades have received a total of 77.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Fungi usually cover Cell Biology (1.7k papers), Infectious Diseases (1.6k papers), Plant Science (2.6k papers), Pharmacology (1.1k papers) and Epidemiology (1.5k papers) specifically the topics of Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1.6k papers), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (1.5k papers), Fungal Infections and Studies (1.3k papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (994 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (895 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (750 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (393 papers) and Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (344 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Fungi are David W. Denning, Felix Bongomin, Rita Oladele, Sara Gago, Arunaloke Chakrabarti, Hariprasath Prakash, Roberto Martínez, Nathan P. Wiederhold, Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis and Martin Hoenigl.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.