Thomas Naff

685 citations
21 papers · 444 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Naff

17 papers receiving 316 citations

Peers

Thomas Naff
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • General Energy 11
  • Political Science and International Relations 226
  • Anthropology 75
  • Sociology and Political Science 275
  • Ocean Engineering 61
Replace Samer Alatout with:
Samer Alatout United States
Sharif S. Elmusa United States
Michael E. Bonine United States
Kyle T. Evered United States
John K. Cooley United States
David Gilmartin United States
Milton Osborne United States
Sarah C. Chambers United States
Miriam R. Lowi United States
Majed Akhter United States
Thomas Naff relative to Samer Alatout United States Samer Alatout's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Samer Alatout · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Naff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Naff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Naff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Naff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Naff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Naff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Naff. The network helps show where Thomas Naff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Naff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Naff Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Naff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978137
2 1987130
3 198534
4 196326
5 196524
6 200221
7 200921
8
Water in the Middle East: A Geography of Peace
200018
9 19968
10 19936
11 20204
12
Water in the Middle East. Cooperation or conflict
19844
13 19993
14 19792
15 19942
16 19972
17 19741
18 19801
19
Water as a Source of Cooperation or Conflict in the Middle East,
19840
20 19890

About Thomas Naff

Thomas Naff is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History, Education and Ocean Engineering, having authored 21 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transboundary Water Resource Management (9 papers), Islamic Studies and History (8 papers), Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (3 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (3 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (3 papers), Water resources management and optimization (2 papers), Ottoman and Turkish Studies (2 papers) and Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Energy (11 citations), Political Science and International Relations (226 citations), Anthropology (75 citations), Sociology and Political Science (275 citations) and Ocean Engineering (61 citations). Thomas Naff has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Roger Owen, Jon E. Mandaville, John Kolars, Frederick W. Frey, Stanford J. Shaw, William Ochsenwald, Howard M. Sachar, Tilman Nagel and Joseph W. Dellapenna. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Geographical Review, Middle Eastern Studies, Water International and The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact