Kyle T. Evered

471 citations
36 papers · 299 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Kyle T. Evered

34 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers

Kyle T. Evered
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Geography, Planning and Development 30
  • Political Science and International Relations 125
  • Anthropology 35
  • History 36
  • Sociology and Political Science 134
Replace Sarah T. Phillips with:
Sarah T. Phillips United States
Raymond B. Craib United States
Yulian Konstantinov Germany
Teo Ballvé United States
Heather Nicol Canada
Jeff Garmany United Kingdom
Jeremy M. Campbell United States
Radha D’Souza United Kingdom
Martin Ira Glassner United States
Brian Donahoe Germany
Kyle T. Evered relative to Sarah T. Phillips United States Sarah T. Phillips's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Sarah T. Phillips · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle T. Evered

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle T. Evered's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle T. Evered with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle T. Evered more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle T. Evered

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle T. Evered. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle T. Evered. The network helps show where Kyle T. Evered may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Kyle T. Evered, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle T. Evered Line = papers co-authored together Kyle T. Evered links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200847
2
Contentious Geographies: Environment, Meaning, Scale
200821
3 201119
4 201218
5 201117
6 201513
7 201113
8 201812
9 200811
10 201110
11 201210
12 201310
13 20139
14 20169
15 20119
16 20138
17 20158
18 20056
19 20056
20 20125

About Kyle T. Evered

Kyle T. Evered is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Anthropology and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 36 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Turkey's Politics and Society (13 papers), Islamic Studies and History (7 papers), Ottoman and Turkish Studies (6 papers), Sex work and related issues (3 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (3 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers) and Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (30 citations), Political Science and International Relations (125 citations), Anthropology (35 citations), History (36 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (134 citations). Kyle T. Evered has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Jiaguo Qi, Maxwell Boykoff and Michael S. Goodman. Their work appears in journals such as Geographical Review, Journal of Historical Geography, Political Geography, Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East and Middle Eastern Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact