Geographical Review

4.4k papers and 109.3k indexed citations

About

The 4.4k papers published in Geographical Review in the last decades have received a total of 109.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Geographical Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (839 papers), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (383 papers) and Anthropology (381 papers) specifically the topics of American Environmental and Regional History (232 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (153 papers) and Geographic Information Systems Studies (100 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geographical Review are Yi‐Fu Tuan, David Harvey, A. W. Küchler, Dieter Mueller‐Dombois, Heinz Ellenberg, Kent Mathewson, Edward Relph, Wilbur Zelinsky, Christopher J. Smith and Roger M. Downs.

In The Last Decade

Geographical Review

2.8k papers receiving 49.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Geographical Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Geographical Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geographical Review.

Countries where authors publish in Geographical Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geographical Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geographical Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geographical Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026