Middle Eastern Studies

2.1k papers and 9.4k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Middle Eastern Studies in the last decades have received a total of 9.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Middle Eastern Studies usually cover Political Science and International Relations (1.3k papers), Sociology and Political Science (1.3k papers) and Anthropology (219 papers) specifically the topics of Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (693 papers), Islamic Studies and History (670 papers) and Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (430 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Middle Eastern Studies are Mesut Yeğen, Kemal Kirişçi, Ayşe Kadıoğlu, Zіya Önіş, Ayşe Buḡra, Andrew Mango, Onn Winckler, A. Nizar Hamzeh, Jacob M. Landau and Meltem Müftüler‐Baç.

In The Last Decade

Middle Eastern Studies

1.5k papers receiving 6.8k citations

Fields of papers published in Middle Eastern Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Middle Eastern Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Middle Eastern Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Middle Eastern Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Middle Eastern Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Middle Eastern Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Middle Eastern Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026