Thomas Mormann

829 citations
100 papers · 473 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Mormann

88 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers

Thomas Mormann
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • History and Philosophy of Science 299
  • Theoretical Computer Science 68
  • General Psychology 28
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 150
  • Mathematical Physics 54
Replace Erich H. Reck with:
Erich H. Reck United States
J. Alberto Coffa United States
Paul Cortois Belgium
Gottfried Gabriel Germany
David M. Sherry United States
Christopher Pincock United States
Richard L. Tieszen United States
Paolo Mancosu United States
Brent Mundy United States
Thomas A. Ryckman United States
Thomas Mormann relative to Erich H. Reck United States Erich H. Reck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Erich H. Reck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Mormann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Mormann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Mormann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Mormann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Mormann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Mormann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Mormann. The network helps show where Thomas Mormann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Mormann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Mormann Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Mormann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Space of Mathematics
199234
2 200722
3 200620
4 201219
5 200717
6 200715
7 199115
8 200414
9 199314
10 201314
11 199412
12 198811
13 200710
14 19999
15 20109
16 20068
17 20038
18 20108
19 20118
20 20127

About Thomas Mormann

Thomas Mormann is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Theoretical Computer Science, Philosophy and Mathematical Physics, having authored 100 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Science, and History (46 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (45 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (25 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (13 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (8 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (8 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (6 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (299 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (68 citations), General Psychology (28 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (150 citations) and Mathematical Physics (54 citations). Thomas Mormann has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mikhail G. Katz, Javier Echeverría, Vladimir Grigor'evich Kanovei, R. Ely, David Schaps, Kalman Katz, David M. Sherry and S. S. Kutateladze. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, Erkenntnis, Philosophy of Science and Logic and Logical Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact