Logic and Logical Philosophy

396 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 396 papers published in Logic and Logical Philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Logic and Logical Philosophy usually cover Artificial Intelligence (248 papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (197 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (77 papers) specifically the topics of Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (224 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (173 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (93 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Logic and Logical Philosophy are Stanisław Jaśkowski, Andrzej Indrzejczak, Sergei P. Odintsov, Diderik Batens, Walter Carnielli, Heinrich Wansing, João Marcos, Sandra de Amo, Thomas Mormann and Jean-Yves Béziau.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Logic and Logical Philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Logic and Logical Philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Logic and Logical Philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in Logic and Logical Philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Logic and Logical Philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Logic and Logical Philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Logic and Logical Philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025