Thomas Lachmann

3.8k citations
147 papers · 2.9k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Lachmann

141 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Thomas Lachmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.1k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.5k
  • Statistics and Probability 582
  • Speech and Hearing 360
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 683
Replace Guilherme Wood with:
Guilherme Wood Austria
Emily M. Elliott United States
Thomas S. Redick United States
Valérie Camos Switzerland
André Vandierendonck Belgium
Richard P. Heitz United States
Francesca Pazzaglia Italy
William J. Macken United Kingdom
Mary M. Smyth United Kingdom
Candice C. Morey United Kingdom
Thomas Lachmann relative to Guilherme Wood Austria Guilherme Wood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Guilherme Wood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Lachmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Lachmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Lachmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Lachmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Lachmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Lachmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Lachmann. The network helps show where Thomas Lachmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Lachmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Lachmann Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Lachmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 147 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013320
2 2010195
3 2005118
4 199597
5 201986
6 201780
7 201566
8 201665
9 200765
10 201063
11 201254
12 199552
13 200450
14 200250
15 200250
16 200045
17 201744
18 200840
19 200739
20 200839

About Thomas Lachmann

Thomas Lachmann is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Education, having authored 147 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (49 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (31 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (18 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (17 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (16 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (16 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (15 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.1k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Statistics and Probability (582 citations), Speech and Hearing (360 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (683 citations). Thomas Lachmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Spain and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Cees van Leeuwen, Maria Klatte, Kirstin Bergström, Claudia Steinbrink, Saskia Jaarsveld, Markus Meis, Stefan Berti, Jeff Miller, Eric Ruthruff and Falk Huettig. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Psychologica, Frontiers in Psychology, Scientific Reports, Biological Psychology and Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact