Kate Gee
Impact in
- Conservation top 5%
- Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Music top 5%
- Diverse Music Education Insights
Papers in
-
- Music Therapy and Health 3
- Humor Studies and Applications 1
- Health 3
- Health disparities and outcomes 2
- Co-authors
- Peter Woodruff (3 shared papers)Daniel Tai-yin Tsoi (3 shared papers)Fergal W. Jones (2 shared papers)Aaron Williamon (3 shared papers)Urszula Tymoszuk (3 shared papers)Rosie Perkins (3 shared papers)Neta Spiro (3 shared papers)Adele Mason-Bertrand (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Schizophrenia Research (1 paper)Journal of American College Health (1 paper)Frontiers in Psychology (1 paper)BMC Public Health (1 paper)Cultural Trends (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Kate Gee
15 papers receiving 291 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Conservation 32
- Music 28
- Applied Psychology 21
- Psychiatry and Mental health 59
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 51
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Gee
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Gee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Gee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Gee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Gee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Gee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Gee. The network helps show where Kate Gee may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Kate Gee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 76 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 42 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 32 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 9 | Views of an audience: understanding the orchestral concert experience from player and listener perspectives | 2013 | 12 |
| 10 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 15 | Arts engagement trends in the UK and their mental and social wellbeing implications: HEartS survey | 2021 | 1 |
| 16 | 2025 | 0 |
About Kate Gee
Kate Gee is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Health, Music, Sociology and Political Science and Conservation, having authored 16 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diverse Music Education Insights (3 papers), Music Therapy and Health (3 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Nursing education and management (1 paper), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (1 paper), Humor Studies and Applications (1 paper) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (32 citations), Music (28 citations), Applied Psychology (21 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (59 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (51 citations). Kate Gee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter Woodruff, Daniel Tai-yin Tsoi, Fergal W. Jones, Aaron Williamon, Urszula Tymoszuk, Rosie Perkins, Neta Spiro, Adele Mason-Bertrand, Kwang-Hyuk Lee and Graham Pluck. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Journal of American College Health, Frontiers in Psychology, BMC Public Health and Cultural Trends.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.