Thomas E. Angel

2.4k citations
39 papers · 1.9k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas E. Angel

39 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Thomas E. Angel
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Spectroscopy 386
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 325
  • Molecular Biology 1.1k
  • Virology 56
  • Biological Psychiatry 24
Replace Steven H. Seeholzer with:
Steven H. Seeholzer United States
Simon H. J. Brown Australia
Tohru Ichimura Japan
Insil Kim United States
Cheryl F. Lichti United States
P. R. Carnegie Australia
Heinz Hillen Germany
Rüdiger Pipkorn Germany
Oliver Schmidt Germany
Clay Bracken United States
Thomas E. Angel relative to Steven H. Seeholzer United States Steven H. Seeholzer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Steven H. Seeholzer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Angel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Angel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Angel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Angel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Angel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Angel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Angel. The network helps show where Thomas E. Angel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Angel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Angel Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Angel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012336
2 2009209
3 2009176
4 2010167
5 2012138
6 201184
7 201684
8 201569
9 201556
10 201255
11 201548
12 201242
13 200340
14 201337
15 200936
16 201336
17 201031
18 201426
19 201225
20 201224

About Thomas E. Angel

Thomas E. Angel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Spectroscopy, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Physiology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (5 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (5 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (386 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (325 citations), Molecular Biology (1.1k citations), Virology (56 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (24 citations). Thomas E. Angel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Krzysztof Palczewski, Mark R. Chance, Richard Smith, Uma K. Aryal, Ryan Kelly, Erin Baker, Errol Robinson, Shawna Hengel, Edward A. Dratz and Algirdas J. Jesaitis. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Proteome Research, Analytical Chemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact