Thomas Dowe
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Papers in
-
- Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology 4
- Surgery 2
- Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery 1
- Co-authors
- Steffen Böhm (3 shared papers)Michelle Lockley (3 shared papers)Darren Ennis (3 shared papers)Asma Faruqi (2 shared papers)Arjun Jeyarajah (2 shared papers)Amanda Fitzpatrick (2 shared papers)Naveena Singh (2 shared papers)Elly Brockbank (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Animal Science (3 papers)Clinical Cancer Research (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (1 paper)Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society (1 paper)Experimental Biology and Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Thomas Dowe
10 papers receiving 595 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Reproductive Medicine 249
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 81
- Oncology 279
- Immunology 206
- Cancer Research 114
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Dowe
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Dowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Dowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Dowe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Dowe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Dowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Dowe. The network helps show where Thomas Dowe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Dowe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 195 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 172 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 111 | |
| 4 | Noninvasive urinary miRNA biomarkers for early detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. | 2015 | 92 |
| 5 | 1957 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1954 | 9 | |
| 7 | 1954 | 4 | |
| 8 | Evaluation of Ground Corncobs and Corncob Components as Nutritive Materials in Rations for Beef Cattle | 1957 | 2 |
| 9 | 1955 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1955 | 1 |
About Thomas Dowe
Thomas Dowe is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Surgery, Animal Science and Zoology, Immunology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (4 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (2 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (1 paper), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (1 paper), Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science (1 paper), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (1 paper) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (249 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (81 citations), Oncology (279 citations), Immunology (206 citations) and Cancer Research (114 citations). Thomas Dowe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Steffen Böhm, Michelle Lockley, Darren Ennis, Asma Faruqi, Arjun Jeyarajah, Amanda Fitzpatrick, Naveena Singh, Elly Brockbank, Joanne Topping and Oliver M.T. Pearce. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Clinical Cancer Research, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society and Experimental Biology and Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.