H Teshima

618 citations
48 papers · 508 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

H Teshima

40 papers receiving 480 citations

Peers

H Teshima
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 75
  • Reproductive Medicine 87
  • Epidemiology 143
  • Oncology 88
  • Cancer Research 46
Replace Sandra Kolkman-Uljee with:
Sandra Kolkman-Uljee Netherlands
P Bõsze Hungary
Tatsuya Kanuma Japan
Sanna Oksjoki Finland
Kaisa Kurvinen Finland
May M.Y. Yu Hong Kong
So‐Fan Yim Hong Kong
Cheng-Tao Lin Taiwan
Chih‐Ming Ho Taiwan
M. Paredes-Espinoza United States
H Teshima relative to Sandra Kolkman-Uljee Netherlands Sandra Kolkman-Uljee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sandra Kolkman-Uljee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H Teshima

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H Teshima's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H Teshima with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H Teshima more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H Teshima

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H Teshima. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H Teshima. The network helps show where H Teshima may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H Teshima, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H Teshima Line = papers co-authored together H Teshima links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006106
2 199263
3 199344
4 199441
5 200537
6
Endoscopic therapy in patients with inoperable early gastric cancer.
199035
7 199327
8
Serous papillary cystadenocarcinoma associated with alpha-fetoprotein production.
198427
9 198922
10 199712
11 199512
12 199611
13 19958
14 19896
15 19885
16
Endoscopic therapy for gastric cancer in patients more than 80 years old.
19915
17 19815
18 19884
19 19874
20
[A clinicopathological study in clear cell adenocarcinoma of the endometrium].
19964

About H Teshima

H Teshima is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 508 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (11 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (11 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (11 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (3 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (3 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (3 papers) and Metastasis and carcinoma case studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (75 citations), Reproductive Medicine (87 citations), Epidemiology (143 citations), Oncology (88 citations) and Cancer Research (46 citations). H Teshima has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, France and Armenia. Frequent co-authors include Katsuhiko Hasumi, Xavier Sastre‐Garau, J Couturier, Christophe Rosty, Martine Peter, François Radvanyi, Włodzimierz J. Krzyżosiak, Susumu Nishimura, Nobuko Shindo‐Okada and Yasuo Hirai. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Blood and Oncogene.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact