H. Egger

33 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers

H. Egger
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 124
  • Reproductive Medicine 76
  • Oncology 136
  • Cancer Research 73
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 78
Replace H Teshima with:
H Teshima Japan
P Bõsze Hungary
Thomas K. Lidner United States
L. Perrone Italy
Tatsuya Kanuma Japan
Cheepsumon Suthipintawong Thailand
Kathy Ceballos Canada
I. Aref United States
M Hilgarth Germany
Meral Koyuncuoğlu Türkiye
H. Egger relative to H Teshima Japan H Teshima's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
H Teshima · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Egger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Egger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Egger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Egger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Egger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Egger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Egger. The network helps show where H. Egger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Egger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Egger Line = papers co-authored together H. Egger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974105
2 2012101
3 200735
4 200027
5 201624
6 198520
7 198219
8 198217
9 198213
10 198212
11 197912
12 198810
13 19779
14 19827
15 20157
16 19766
17 19776
18 19795
19
[Microcalcifications on the mammaogram, surgical clarification and histologic findings. Concerning the problem of the diagnosis of occult carcinoma of the breast (author's transl)].
19765
20
[Surface scraping and curettage of the cervix - an alternative procedure to conization in patients with positive cytology (author's transl)].
19754

About H. Egger

H. Egger is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Reproductive Medicine, Oncology and Surgery, having authored 36 papers that have together received 474 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (9 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (8 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (6 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (4 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (4 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (4 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (3 papers) and Urologic and reproductive health conditions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (124 citations), Reproductive Medicine (76 citations), Oncology (136 citations), Cancer Research (73 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (78 citations). H. Egger has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Fink, Patrick Imesch, Anja Schmidt, Harald zur Hausen, Heinrich Schulte‐Holthausen, Hans Wolf, Kristina Dörries, A. H. Tulusan, A.H. Tulusan and Heinz Scholz. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Cytogenetic and Genome Research, International Journal of Cancer and International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact