Thomas Doert

6.1k citations
236 papers · 5.1k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Doert

230 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Peers

Thomas Doert
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Condensed Matter Physics 1.6k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.2k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 690
  • Catalysis 222
  • General Materials Science 69
Replace O. Peña with:
O. Peña France
Michael Ruck Germany
Svend Erik Rasmussen Denmark
Martin Valldor Germany
Vratislav Langer Sweden
Takashi Takeda Japan
Philippe Négrier France
Jean‐Yves Buzaré France
Anthony C. Jones United Kingdom
Wiesław Łasocha Poland
Thomas Doert relative to O. Peña France O. Peña's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
O. Peña · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Doert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Doert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Doert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Doert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Doert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Doert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Doert. The network helps show where Thomas Doert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Doert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Doert Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Doert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 236 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011246
2 2019233
3 2021193
4 2018178
5 2017175
6 2018156
7 2019138
8 2010125
9 2009122
10 2010115
11 201694
12 201993
13 201892
14 201978
15 202163
16 201862
17 201661
18 201259
19 200453
20 201653

About Thomas Doert

Thomas Doert is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Inorganic Chemistry, Condensed Matter Physics, Catalysis and Materials Chemistry, having authored 236 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystal Structures and Properties (94 papers), Crystal structures of chemical compounds (39 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (32 papers), Inorganic Chemistry and Materials (29 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (27 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (12 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (9 papers) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (1.6k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.2k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (690 citations), Catalysis (222 citations) and General Materials Science (69 citations). Thomas Doert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Michael Ruck, Anna A. Isaeva, P. Böttcher, Bernd Büchner, Ralf Albrecht, Chengtie Wu, Renate Schulze, Anja U. B. Wolter, Tao Zhang and Jens Hunger. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B., Chemistry - A European Journal, Inorganic Chemistry, European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry and Dalton Transactions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact