Theda Perdue
Impact in
- Anthropology top 2%
- Archaeology and Natural History
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade
- Archeology top 5%
Papers in
- Anthropology 27
- Archaeology and Natural History 22
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade 5
-
- Indigenous Studies and Ecology 12
- Co-authors
- Kathleen M. Brown (1 shared paper)Circe Sturm (1 shared paper)Michael D. Green (8 shared papers)William L. Anderson (1 shared paper)Daniel F. Littlefield (2 shared papers)Sarah Hill (1 shared paper)Clara Sue Kidwell (1 shared paper)Mary Young (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Southern History (9 papers)The William and Mary Quarterly (6 papers)Ethnohistory (6 papers)Western Historical Quarterly (5 papers)Journal of the Early Republic (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Theda Perdue
51 papers receiving 405 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Anthropology 278
- Archeology 25
- Health 126
- Marketing 147
- Cultural Studies 106
Countries citing papers authored by Theda Perdue
This map shows the geographic impact of Theda Perdue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theda Perdue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theda Perdue more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Theda Perdue
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Theda Perdue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Theda Perdue. The network helps show where Theda Perdue may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Theda Perdue, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 124 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 94 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 82 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 74 | |
| 5 | 1980 | 54 | |
| 6 | The Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears | 2007 | 37 |
| 7 | 2004 | 33 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 10 | 1979 | 23 | |
| 11 | 1984 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 15 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 14 | |
| 15 | 1980 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1980 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 10 | |
| 19 | 1977 | 9 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 8 |
About Theda Perdue
Theda Perdue is a scholar working on Anthropology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Health, having authored 58 papers that have together received 805 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and Natural History (22 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (12 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (10 papers), Canadian Identity and History (5 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (5 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (4 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (4 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (278 citations), Archeology (25 citations), Health (126 citations), Marketing (147 citations) and Cultural Studies (106 citations). Theda Perdue has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen M. Brown, Circe Sturm, Michael D. Green, William L. Anderson, Daniel F. Littlefield, Sarah Hill, Clara Sue Kidwell, Mary Young, Francis Paul Prucha and Elizabeth Fox‐Genovese. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Southern History, The William and Mary Quarterly, Ethnohistory, Western Historical Quarterly and Journal of the Early Republic.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.