The William and Mary Quarterly

4.0k papers and 36.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.0k papers published in The William and Mary Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 36.7k indexed citations. Papers published in The William and Mary Quarterly usually cover Political Science and International Relations (1.6k papers), Anthropology (676 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (550 papers) specifically the topics of American Constitutional Law and Politics (1.5k papers), American History and Culture (435 papers) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (384 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The William and Mary Quarterly are Myra Jehlen, Edward W. Said, J. G. A. Pocock, Caroline Robbins, Alfred W. Crosby, Winthrop D. Jordan, David Brion Davis, Arthur Mann, Gary S. Dunbar and Louis Hartz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The William and Mary Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The William and Mary Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The William and Mary Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in The William and Mary Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The William and Mary Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The William and Mary Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The William and Mary Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025