Frederick E. Hoxie

44 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

Frederick E. Hoxie
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Health 150
  • Anthropology 145
  • Cultural Studies 93
  • Marketing 72
  • Archeology 7
Replace Wilcomb E. Washburn with:
Wilcomb E. Washburn United States
Jennifer S. H. Brown Canada
Ronald N. Satz United States
Donald L. Fixico United States
Nancy Shoemaker United States
Colin G. Calloway United States
Jack L. Davis
Robert E. Bieder United States
Patricia Nelson Limerick United States
Philip J. Deloria United States
Frederick E. Hoxie relative to Wilcomb E. Washburn United States Wilcomb E. Washburn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Wilcomb E. Washburn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick E. Hoxie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick E. Hoxie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick E. Hoxie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick E. Hoxie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick E. Hoxie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick E. Hoxie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick E. Hoxie. The network helps show where Frederick E. Hoxie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Frederick E. Hoxie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick E. Hoxie Line = papers co-authored together Frederick E. Hoxie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986155
2 199059
3 198558
4 198548
5 199832
6 200829
7 199623
8
Talking Back To Civilization: Indian Voices from the Progressive Era
200119
9
This Indian Country: American Indian Activists and the Place They Made
201216
10 199215
11 200014
12 199113
13
American nations : encounters in Indian country, 1850 to the present
200110
14 199610
15 19859
16 19978
17
The People: A History of Native America
20067
18 20017
19 20007
20 19995

About Frederick E. Hoxie

Frederick E. Hoxie is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Political Science and International Relations and Health, having authored 59 papers that have together received 617 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and Natural History (9 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (6 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Asian American and Pacific Histories (3 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (2 papers) and American History and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (150 citations), Anthropology (145 citations), Cultural Studies (93 citations), Marketing (72 citations) and Archeology (7 citations). Frederick E. Hoxie has collaborated with scholars based in Latvia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include William E. Unrau, Albert L. Hurtado, Jennifer S. H. Brown, Wilcomb E. Washburn, Donald L. Fixico, Kenneth R. Philp, Ronald Hoffman, Peter C. Mancall, James H. Merrell and Peter J. Albert. Their work appears in journals such as Western Historical Quarterly, Journal of American History, Ethnohistory, American Journal of Legal History and Cultural and Social History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact