Western Historical Quarterly

3.7k papers and 27.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.7k papers published in Western Historical Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 27.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Western Historical Quarterly usually cover Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (1.2k papers), Anthropology (997 papers) and Marketing (826 papers) specifically the topics of American Environmental and Regional History (1.2k papers), Archaeology and Natural History (859 papers) and American History and Culture (826 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Western Historical Quarterly are Yến Lê Espiritu, Donald Worster, Mae M. Ngai, Harold K. Steen, Stephen J. Pyne, William Cronon, Richard Slotkin, Lawrence Rakestraw, David W. Adams and Courtney Vaughn.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Western Historical Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Western Historical Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Western Historical Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Western Historical Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Western Historical Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Western Historical Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Western Historical Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025