Thane Chambers

38 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Thane Chambers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 128
  • Applied Psychology 38
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 34
  • General Health Professions 155
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 41
Replace Sanja Lujic with:
Sanja Lujic Australia
Manuel Gomes United Kingdom
D Ershoff United States
Erik Farin‐Glattacker Germany
Reshma Golamari United States
Gábrielle McKee Ireland
Lis Wagner Denmark
Megan Hamm United States
Nathalie Pelletier‐Fleury France
Javier Jerez‐Roig Spain
Thane Chambers relative to Sanja Lujic Australia Sanja Lujic's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Sanja Lujic · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thane Chambers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thane Chambers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thane Chambers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thane Chambers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thane Chambers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thane Chambers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thane Chambers. The network helps show where Thane Chambers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thane Chambers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thane Chambers Line = papers co-authored together Thane Chambers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018193
2 2018156
3 2012101
4 201487
5 201946
6 201737
7 201635
8 201634
9 201534
10 201734
11 201131
12 201828
13 202024
14 201221
15 201417
16 201617
17 202016
18 201515
19 201614
20 201812

About Thane Chambers

Thane Chambers is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Sciences Research and Education (4 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (2 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (128 citations), Applied Psychology (38 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (34 citations), General Health Professions (155 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (41 citations). Thane Chambers has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gilgamesh Eamer, Rachel G. Khadaroo, Maria B. Ospina, Xinzhe Shi, Isaiah MacDonald, Sana Amjad, Álvaro Osornio-Vargas, Don Voaklander, Sujata Chandra and Wendy Duggleby. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA, Neurourology and Urodynamics, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Systematic Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact