Thane Chambers

1.7k citations
42 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Thane Chambers

39 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Thane Chambers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 136
  • Applied Psychology 43
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 34
  • General Health Professions 163
  • Health 50
Replace D Ershoff with:
D Ershoff United States
Sanja Lujic Australia
Christine E. Kistler United States
Manuel Gomes United Kingdom
Juan Manuel Cabasés Hita Spain
Erik Farin‐Glattacker Germany
Lis Wagner Denmark
Javier Jerez‐Roig Spain
Megan Hamm United States
Rebecca M. Saracino United States
Thane Chambers relative to D Ershoff United States D Ershoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.1×
D Ershoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thane Chambers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thane Chambers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thane Chambers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thane Chambers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thane Chambers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thane Chambers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thane Chambers. The network helps show where Thane Chambers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thane Chambers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thane Chambers Line = papers co-authored together Thane Chambers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018202
2 2018158
3 2012108
4 201491
5 201946
6 201540
7 201738
8 201636
9 201736
10 201635
11 201133
12 201832
13 202024
14 201222
15 201619
16 201417
17 201516
18 202016
19 201815
20 201614

About Thane Chambers

Thane Chambers is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Sciences Research and Education (4 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (2 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (136 citations), Applied Psychology (43 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (34 citations), General Health Professions (163 citations) and Health (50 citations). Thane Chambers has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gilgamesh Eamer, Rachel G. Khadaroo, Maria B. Ospina, Xinzhe Shi, Isaiah MacDonald, Álvaro Osornio-Vargas, Sana Amjad, Sujata Chandra, Lorraine Holtslander and Don Voaklander. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Neurourology and Urodynamics, Supportive Care in Cancer and Systematic Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact