Thane Chambers

1.6k citations
42 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Thane Chambers

40 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Thane Chambers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 163
  • General Health Professions 250
  • Health 83
  • Applied Psychology 48
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 60
Replace Tom O’Dowd with:
Tom O’Dowd Ireland
Sanja Lujic Australia
Melissa M. Parker United States
Karen M. Goldstein United States
Rebecca M. Saracino United States
R. Liisa Jaakkimainen Canada
Dorte Gilså Hansen Denmark
Elizabeth Ann Shaw Canada
Thomas C. O'Dowd Ireland
Renee A. Milligan United States
Thane Chambers relative to Tom O’Dowd Ireland Tom O’Dowd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.6×
Tom O’Dowd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thane Chambers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thane Chambers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thane Chambers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thane Chambers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thane Chambers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thane Chambers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thane Chambers. The network helps show where Thane Chambers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thane Chambers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thane Chambers Line = papers co-authored together Thane Chambers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018220
2 2018169
3 2012111
4 201493
5 201951
6 201742
7 201540
8 201639
9 201637
10 201736
11 201836
12 201135
13 202029
14 201222
15 201621
16 201417
17 201517
18 201817
19 202017
20 201613

About Thane Chambers

Thane Chambers is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Information Systems and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information (5 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Library Science and Administration (3 papers), Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Web and Library Services (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (163 citations), General Health Professions (250 citations), Health (83 citations), Applied Psychology (48 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (60 citations). Thane Chambers has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rachel G. Khadaroo, Gilgamesh Eamer, Maria B. Ospina, Xinzhe Shi, Isaiah MacDonald, Álvaro Román Osornio-Vargas, Sana Amjad, Lorraine F. Holtslander, Wendy Duggleby and Sujata Chandra. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Systematic Reviews, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada and Supportive Care in Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact