Chris Belter

1.1k citations
19 papers · 794 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Chris Belter

19 papers receiving 758 citations

Peers

Chris Belter
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 144
  • Information Systems and Management 122
  • Health Informatics 13
  • Information Systems 195
  • Library and Information Sciences 10
Replace Weina Hua with:
Weina Hua China
Nisa Bakkalbasi United States
Markus von Ins Denmark
Eleanor J. Read United States
Askar Safipour Afshar United States
Ali Akbar Khasseh Iran
Jason E. Rollins United States
Christian Herzog Germany
Paul Wilson United Kingdom
Chris Belter relative to Weina Hua China Weina Hua's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Weina Hua · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chris Belter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Belter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Belter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Belter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Belter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Belter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Belter. The network helps show where Chris Belter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chris Belter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chris Belter Line = papers co-authored together Chris Belter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2015220
2 2018138
3 201897
4 201381
5 201474
6 201545
7 201218
8 201817
9 201617
10 201816
11 201716
12 201915
13 201814
14 20198
15
Visualizing Networks of Scientific Research
20126
16
Deepwater Horizon a preliminary bibliography of published research and expert commentary
20114
17 20163
18 20163
19 20142

About Chris Belter

Chris Belter is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions, having authored 19 papers that have together received 794 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (10 papers), Research Data Management Practices (4 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (3 papers), Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (2 papers), Global Health and Surgery (2 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (2 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (144 citations), Information Systems and Management (122 citations), Health Informatics (13 citations), Information Systems (195 citations) and Library and Information Sciences (10 citations). Chris Belter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Peru and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Dian J. Seidel, Alicia A. Livinski, Ya‐Ling Lu, Douglas Joubert, Lisa Federer, Holly Thompson, Nicole Lynn Stout, Karen Lohmann Siegel, Catherine M. Alfano and Ralph M. Nitkin. Their work appears in journals such as Scientometrics, Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA, PLoS ONE, College & Research Libraries and PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact