Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA

25.8k citations
1.3k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA

755 papers receiving 16.9k citations

Peers

Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA
Comparison fields: 5 of 234
  • Library and Information Sciences 1.3k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1.9k
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 297
  • Health Informatics 322
  • General Health Professions 4.9k
Replace Health Information & Libraries Journal with:
Health Information & Libraries Journal United Kingdom
Medical Reference Services Quarterly United States
Research in Higher Education United States
Library & Information Science Research United States
International Journal of Social Research Methodology United Kingdom
Library trends United States
Serials Review United States
International Journal of Qualitative Methods Canada
Health Informatics Journal United States
Harvard business review United States
Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA relative to Health Information & Libraries Journal United Kingdom Health Information & Libraries Journal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Health Information & Libraries Journal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA.

About Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA

The 1.3k papers published in Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA in the last decades have received a total of 25.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA usually cover Library and Information Sciences (85 papers), Medical Terminology (12 papers), General Health Professions (416 papers), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (103 papers) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (15 papers) specifically the topics of Health Sciences Research and Education (331 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (76 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (74 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (59 papers), Web and Library Services (59 papers), Library Science and Administration (43 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (42 papers) and Social Media in Health Education (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA are Elizabeth H. Wood, Deborah H. Charbonneau, Wichor M. Bramer, Nancy Adams, Ian Cooper, Mette Brandt Eriksen, Tove Faber Frandsen, Tanja Bekhuis, Dean Giustini and Leslie Holland.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact