Tamara Ambrona

421 citations
24 papers · 270 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Tamara Ambrona

23 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

Tamara Ambrona
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Social Psychology 127
  • Applied Psychology 26
  • Clinical Psychology 76
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 59
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 41
Replace Leïla Bensalah with:
Leïla Bensalah France
Alexander Batthyány United States
Adam Lueke United States
Matthew D. Smith United Kingdom
Peter G. Sprengelmeyer United States
Lisamarie Bensman United States
Christie Cathey United States
Lindsay C. Morton United States
Jen‐Ho Chang Taiwan
Paul Williams United Kingdom
Tamara Ambrona relative to Leïla Bensalah France Leïla Bensalah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Leïla Bensalah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tamara Ambrona

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tamara Ambrona's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tamara Ambrona with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tamara Ambrona more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tamara Ambrona

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tamara Ambrona. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tamara Ambrona. The network helps show where Tamara Ambrona may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Tamara Ambrona, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tamara Ambrona Line = papers co-authored together Tamara Ambrona links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201241
2 201625
3 201320
4 201420
5 201420
6 201417
7 201416
8 201415
9 201014
10
Measuring general dispositions to feeling empathy and distress.
200914
11 201613
12 20159
13 20229
14 20177
15 20187
16 20226
17 20165
18 20173
19 20213
20 20163

About Tamara Ambrona

Tamara Ambrona is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Education, having authored 24 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotions and Moral Behavior (8 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (5 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (3 papers) and Psychology of Social Influence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (127 citations), Applied Psychology (26 citations), Clinical Psychology (76 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (59 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (41 citations). Tamara Ambrona has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Belén López‐Pérez, Luís Oceja, Pilar Carrera, Michaela Gummerum, Eric Stocks, Amparo Caballero, Dolores Muñoz, María Márquez‐González, Irene Fernández and J.S. Gregory. Their work appears in journals such as Motivation and Emotion, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, Identity, Nurse Education in Practice and Basic and Applied Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact