Luís Oceja

1.4k citations
44 papers · 574 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Luís Oceja

42 papers receiving 547 citations

Peers

Luís Oceja
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Applied Psychology 93
  • Social Psychology 272
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 104
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 139
  • Marketing 54
Replace Rhett Diessner with:
Rhett Diessner United States
Julie Van de Vyver United Kingdom
Julia W. Van de Vondervoort Canada
Marret K. Noordewier Netherlands
Berna Gerçek‐Swing United States
Philip Broemer Germany
Niels J. Van Doesum Netherlands
Maya Rossignac‐Milon United States
Fanli Jia United States
Luís Oceja relative to Rhett Diessner United States Rhett Diessner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rhett Diessner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luís Oceja

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luís Oceja's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luís Oceja with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luís Oceja more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luís Oceja

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luís Oceja. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luís Oceja. The network helps show where Luís Oceja may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luís Oceja, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luís Oceja Line = papers co-authored together Luís Oceja links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200780
2 201241
3 200939
4 200938
5 200835
6 200727
7 200822
8 201320
9 201420
10 201420
11 200720
12 200017
13 201217
14 202216
15 201014
16
Measuring general dispositions to feeling empathy and distress.
200914
17 200112
18 201111
19 201010
20 20119

About Luís Oceja

Luís Oceja is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 574 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (17 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (11 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (10 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (10 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (6 papers), Media Influence and Health (5 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (93 citations), Social Psychology (272 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (104 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (139 citations) and Marketing (54 citations). Luís Oceja has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Pilar Carrera, Belén López‐Pérez, Tamara Ambrona, Eric Stocks, Jaime Berenguer, José Miguel Fernández Dols, Isabel Jiménez Becerra, David A. Lishner, Amparo Caballero and Dolores Muñoz. Their work appears in journals such as Motivation and Emotion, The Spanish Journal of Psychology, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, The Journal of Social Psychology and European Journal of Psychological Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact