Tai‐Jui Chen

2.1k citations
39 papers · 1.6k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Tai‐Jui Chen

39 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Tai‐Jui Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Biological Psychiatry 277
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 183
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 594
  • Developmental Neuroscience 97
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 328
Replace Gerald Valentine with:
Gerald Valentine United States
Toshihito Suzuki Japan
Bruce R. Lawford Australia
Gustavo A. Angarita United States
Akitoyo Hishimoto Japan
Peter S. Talbot United Kingdom
Kaori Koike Japan
Teresa J. Tolliver United States
J.F. Cubells United States
Romano La Harpe Switzerland
Tai‐Jui Chen relative to Gerald Valentine United States Gerald Valentine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gerald Valentine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tai‐Jui Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tai‐Jui Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tai‐Jui Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tai‐Jui Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tai‐Jui Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tai‐Jui Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tai‐Jui Chen. The network helps show where Tai‐Jui Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tai‐Jui Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tai‐Jui Chen Line = papers co-authored together Tai‐Jui Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003188
2 2005146
3 2003123
4 2005100
5 200483
6 200682
7 200481
8 200979
9 200866
10 200553
11 200850
12 200343
13 201042
14 200540
15 200939
16 200538
17 200532
18 201129
19 201129
20 201525

About Tai‐Jui Chen

Tai‐Jui Chen is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (13 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (6 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (5 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (5 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (277 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (183 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (594 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (97 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (328 citations). Tai‐Jui Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Shih‐Jen Tsai, Younger W.‐Y. Yu, Chen‐Jee Hong, Ying‐Jay Liou, Chih‐Ya Cheng, Ming‐Chao Chen, Tien‐Wen Lee, Chih‐Wei Yang, Hung‐Chi Wu and Chen‐Jee Hong. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychobiology, American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics, Pharmacogenetics and Genomics, Journal of Affective Disorders and Neuropsychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact