Ta‐Chen Lin

2.6k citations
51 papers · 2.2k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Ta‐Chen Lin

50 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Ta‐Chen Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 525
  • Biochemistry 317
  • Pharmacology 299
  • Toxicology 93
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 320
Replace Muhammad Tauseef Sultan with:
Muhammad Tauseef Sultan Pakistan
Paul Agastian India
Kamel Ghédira Tunisia
Leônia Maria Batista Brazil
Mariana Helena Chaves Brazil
Shahira M. Ezzat Egypt
Talal Aburjaı Jordan
Graciela Ferraro Argentina
Claudia Anesini Argentina
Josean Fechine Tavares Brazil
Ta‐Chen Lin relative to Muhammad Tauseef Sultan Pakistan Muhammad Tauseef Sultan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Muhammad Tauseef Sultan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ta‐Chen Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ta‐Chen Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ta‐Chen Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ta‐Chen Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ta‐Chen Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ta‐Chen Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ta‐Chen Lin. The network helps show where Ta‐Chen Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ta‐Chen Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ta‐Chen Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ta‐Chen Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003244
2 2002175
3 2002157
4 2000123
5 2004117
6 2009111
7 2006105
8 2001103
9 2001100
10 199989
11 199963
12
Antioxidant and free radical scavenging effects of the tannins of Terminalia catappa L.
200161
13 200258
14 200645
15 199043
16 200240
17 201237
18 200636
19 200536
20 200432

About Ta‐Chen Lin

Ta‐Chen Lin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Complementary and alternative medicine, Biochemistry and Food Science, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants (10 papers), Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits (8 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (7 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (7 papers), Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants (5 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (5 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (5 papers) and Bioactive Natural Diterpenoids Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (525 citations), Biochemistry (317 citations), Pharmacology (299 citations), Toxicology (93 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (320 citations). Ta‐Chen Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Chun‐Ching Lin, Hua‐Yew Cheng, Chien‐Min Yang, Po‐Lin Kuo, Shuenn‐Jyi Sheu, Lih‐Jeng Juang, Sheng-Shung Cheng, Lien‐Chai Chiang, Tsung‐Yun Liu and Pin-Shern Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Separation Science, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, Cancer Letters, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture and Phytotherapy Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact