T. Piek

2.6k citations
109 papers · 2.3k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

T. Piek

108 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

T. Piek
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Insect Science 1.4k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.0k
  • Genetics 871
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 554
  • Pharmacology 418
Replace Maria‐Dolors Piulachs with:
Maria‐Dolors Piulachs Spain
Peter Verleyen Belgium
Hironori Ishizaki Japan
Frank Hauser Denmark
Manfred Eckert Germany
Roger Huybrechts Belgium
Walter E. Bollenbacher United States
Theodore R. F. Wright United States
Kim Kaiser United Kingdom
Neil Audsley United Kingdom
T. Piek relative to Maria‐Dolors Piulachs Spain Maria‐Dolors Piulachs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Maria‐Dolors Piulachs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Piek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Piek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Piek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Piek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Piek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Piek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Piek. The network helps show where T. Piek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Piek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Piek Line = papers co-authored together T. Piek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 109 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990280
2
Venoms of the Hymenoptera: biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural aspects.
1986116
3 198696
4 198277
5 197771
6 199160
7 199156
8 196456
9 197154
10 198254
11 198747
12 199043
13 198641
14 199035
15 199235
16 198735
17 196932
18 197830
19 196629
20 197927

About T. Piek

T. Piek is a scholar working on Insect Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 109 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (58 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (55 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (35 papers), Healthcare and Venom Research (21 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (16 papers), Plant and animal studies (13 papers), Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (10 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.4k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Genetics (871 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (554 citations) and Pharmacology (418 citations). T. Piek has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, France and Italy. Frequent co-authors include P. Mantel, W. Spanjer, Bernard Hue, Jan van Marle, M. Pelhate, Terumi Nakajima, Henk Karst, R.L. Veenendaal, Tadashi Yasuhara and T. E. May. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicon, Journal of Insect Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Pharmacology and Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact