Journal of Insect Physiology

9.2k papers and 262.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 9.2k papers published in Journal of Insect Physiology in the last decades have received a total of 262.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Insect Physiology usually cover Insect Science (5.2k papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (4.5k papers) and Genetics (3.7k papers) specifically the topics of Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4.4k papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3.6k papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (1.9k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Insect Physiology are David L. Denlinger, Vladimı́r Košťál, D.S. Saunders, K. VAN ASPEREN, A. D. Lees, R. H. Dadd, Steven L. Chown, Hans J. Briegel, Roxanne M. Broadway and Arden O. Lea.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Insect Physiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Insect Physiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Insect Physiology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Insect Physiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Insect Physiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Insect Physiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Insect Physiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025