T. E. Bellas

570 citations
27 papers · 505 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

T. E. Bellas

26 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

T. E. Bellas
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Insect Science 363
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 190
  • Immunology and Allergy 28
  • Genetics 127
  • Chemical Health and Safety 2
Replace Denis R. A. Wharton with:
Denis R. A. Wharton United States
Martha L. Wharton United States
S. Ishii Japan
Matthew R. Tarver United States
W. Roelofs United States
Y. S. Chow Taiwan
V. E. Adler United States
Alan D. Clift Australia
Monica Appelgren Sweden
Martine Lettéré France
T. E. Bellas relative to Denis R. A. Wharton United States Denis R. A. Wharton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Denis R. A. Wharton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. E. Bellas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. E. Bellas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. E. Bellas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. E. Bellas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. E. Bellas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. E. Bellas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. E. Bellas. The network helps show where T. E. Bellas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. E. Bellas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. E. Bellas Line = papers co-authored together T. E. Bellas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198380
2 197671
3 197970
4 197435
5 198522
6 198822
7 198920
8 199018
9 197517
10 198616
11 199116
12 198315
13 198815
14 198114
15 198311
16 198411
17 198910
18 19779
19 20049
20 19878

About T. E. Bellas

T. E. Bellas is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Pharmacology and Molecular Biology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Pheromone Research and Control (12 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (12 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (3 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (2 papers) and Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (363 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (190 citations), Immunology and Allergy (28 citations), Genetics (127 citations) and Chemical Health and Safety (2 citations). T. E. Bellas has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include R. J. Bartell, Bradley S. Fletcher, Ada Sinz. Hill, Patrice A. Morrow, Thomas Eisner, C. P. Whittle, W. Vance Brown, B. P. Moore, Bert H�lldobler and Brian A. Baldo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Ecology, Clinical & Experimental Allergy, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Chromatographia and Oecologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact