Sylvia E. Escher

72 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Sylvia E. Escher
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Chemical Health and Safety 49
  • Small Animals 183
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 271
  • Immunology and Allergy 67
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 154
Replace Nancy G. Doerrer with:
Nancy G. Doerrer United States
John E. Doe United Kingdom
Paul Brantom United Kingdom
Stephan Kirchner Switzerland
J.A. Styles United Kingdom
Cameron MacKay United Kingdom
James L. Wilmer United States
Catherine S. Sprankle United States
Sean C. Gehen United States
Annamaria Colacci Italy
Sylvia E. Escher relative to Nancy G. Doerrer United States Nancy G. Doerrer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Nancy G. Doerrer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sylvia E. Escher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sylvia E. Escher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sylvia E. Escher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sylvia E. Escher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sylvia E. Escher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sylvia E. Escher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sylvia E. Escher. The network helps show where Sylvia E. Escher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sylvia E. Escher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sylvia E. Escher Line = papers co-authored together Sylvia E. Escher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200893
2 200474
3 202255
4 201055
5 200144
6 201142
7 200535
8 201732
9 201130
10 201929
11 200429
12 200227
13 197026
14 199923
15 201221
16 201619
17 201619
18 201018
19 201718
20 201317

About Sylvia E. Escher

Sylvia E. Escher is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Oncology, Small Animals, Molecular Biology and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemokine receptors and signaling (17 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (16 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (15 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (14 papers), Agricultural safety and regulations (8 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (8 papers), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (7 papers) and Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (49 citations), Small Animals (183 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (271 citations), Immunology and Allergy (67 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (154 citations). Sylvia E. Escher has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ulf Forssmann, Jörn Elsner, Inge Mangelsdorf, Wolf‐Georg Forssmann, Knut Adermann, Monika Batke, Harrie Buist, Christine Melber, Ralph Kühne and Annette Bitsch. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology Letters, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Allergy, Journal of Leukocyte Biology and The Journal of Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact