J.A. Styles
Impact in
- Chemical Health and Safety top 0.5%
- Cancer Research top 1%
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Papers in
-
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment 42
-
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 9
- Co-authors
- John Ashby (20 shared papers)Diana Anderson (9 shared papers)A. G. Heppleston (2 shared papers)P.A. Lefevre (9 shared papers)E. Longstaff (6 shared papers)J. Ashby (8 shared papers)I. F. H. Purchase (4 shared papers)F. Russell Westwood (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Carcinogenesis (16 papers)British Journal of Cancer (10 papers)Cancer Letters (7 papers)Environmental Health Perspectives (4 papers)Nature (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIsrael
In The Last Decade
J.A. Styles
74 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
- Chemical Health and Safety 70
- Cancer Research 1.2k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 558
- Pharmacology 188
- Molecular Biology 838
Countries citing papers authored by J.A. Styles
This map shows the geographic impact of J.A. Styles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.A. Styles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.A. Styles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J.A. Styles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.A. Styles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.A. Styles. The network helps show where J.A. Styles may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.A. Styles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1978 | 280 | |
| 2 | 1967 | 232 | |
| 3 | 1976 | 202 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 101 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 100 | |
| 6 | 1978 | 97 | |
| 7 | 1977 | 83 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 70 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 69 | |
| 10 | Tamoxifen causes gene mutations in the livers of lambda/lacI transgenic rats. | 1997 | 64 |
| 11 | 1978 | 55 | |
| 12 | 1978 | 51 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 50 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 39 | |
| 15 | 1987 | 38 | |
| 16 | 1982 | 36 | |
| 17 | 1978 | 31 | |
| 18 | 1982 | 31 | |
| 19 | 1985 | 30 | |
| 20 | 1978 | 30 |
About J.A. Styles
J.A. Styles is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Plant Science and Organic Chemistry, having authored 76 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (42 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (9 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (8 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (6 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (5 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (5 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (5 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (70 citations), Cancer Research (1.2k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (558 citations), Pharmacology (188 citations) and Molecular Biology (838 citations). J.A. Styles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include John Ashby, Diana Anderson, A. G. Heppleston, P.A. Lefevre, E. Longstaff, J. Ashby, I. F. H. Purchase, F. Russell Westwood, D. Patón and Ian N.H. White. Their work appears in journals such as Carcinogenesis, British Journal of Cancer, Cancer Letters, Environmental Health Perspectives and Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.