Michael Stephan

3.9k citations
129 papers · 2.6k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Stephan

112 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Michael Stephan
Comparison fields: 5 of 186
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 139
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 569
  • Biological Psychiatry 69
  • Developmental Neuroscience 90
  • Oncology 457
Replace Min Chen with:
Min Chen China
Wenting Wang China
Guangyu Wu United States
Suzanne D. Conzen United States
Guanghua Xiao United States
Quaid Morris Canada
Michael P. Smith United States
Zhaohui Qin United States
Sherry L. Jenkins United States
Michael Stephan relative to Min Chen China Min Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Min Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Stephan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Stephan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Stephan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Stephan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Stephan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Stephan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Stephan. The network helps show where Michael Stephan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Stephan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Stephan Line = papers co-authored together Michael Stephan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 129 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016336
2 2015165
3
Comparison of brain structure volumes in Insectivora and Primates. I. Neocortex.
1982138
4 2008104
5 2006100
6 200895
7 201594
8 200285
9 201083
10 200781
11 199180
12 199570
13 199260
14 200958
15 200940
16 200239
17 200938
18 200638
19 201936
20 200835

About Michael Stephan

Michael Stephan is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology, Management of Technology and Innovation and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 129 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (16 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (15 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (13 papers), Corporate Governance and Management (11 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (8 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (6 papers), Innovation, Technology, and Society (5 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (139 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (569 citations), Biological Psychiatry (69 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (90 citations) and Oncology (457 citations). Michael Stephan has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Stephan von Hörsten, Christian Klemann, Leona Wagner, Reinhard Pabst, Heinz Stephan, Heiko D. Frahm, Wolf D. Lehmann, Gerhard Fürstenberger, Andreas Schmiedl and Rainer H. Straub. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical & Experimental Immunology, International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Behavioural Brain Research, Immunobiology and The Journal of Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact