Michael Stephan

3.9k citations
102 papers · 2.4k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Stephan

96 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Michael Stephan
Comparison fields: 5 of 183
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 135
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 547
  • Biological Psychiatry 66
  • Developmental Neuroscience 86
  • Oncology 446
Replace Min Chen with:
Min Chen China
Wenting Wang China
Suzanne D. Conzen United States
Andreas Teufel Germany
Guangyu Wu United States
Guanghua Xiao United States
Michael P. Smith United States
Zhaohui Qin United States
Sherry L. Jenkins United States
Michael Stephan relative to Min Chen China Min Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Min Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Stephan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Stephan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Stephan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Stephan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Stephan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Stephan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Stephan. The network helps show where Michael Stephan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Stephan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Stephan Line = papers co-authored together Michael Stephan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016334
2 2015146
3
Comparison of brain structure volumes in Insectivora and Primates. I. Neocortex.
1982113
4 2008102
5 200697
6 200893
7 201592
8 200285
9 201080
10 200777
11 199173
12 199565
13 200957
14 199256
15 200938
16 200238
17 200936
18 201935
19 200832
20 201532

About Michael Stephan

Michael Stephan is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology, Strategy and Management, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 102 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (15 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (13 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (9 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (6 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (6 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (5 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (5 papers) and Product Development and Customization (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (135 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (547 citations), Biological Psychiatry (66 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (86 citations) and Oncology (446 citations). Michael Stephan has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Stephan von Hörsten, Christian Klemann, Leona Wagner, Reinhard Pabst, Heinz Stephan, Wolf D. Lehmann, Heiko D. Frahm, Gerhard Fürstenberger, Andreas Schmiedl and Rainer H. Straub. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical & Experimental Immunology, Behavioural Brain Research, International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, PLoS ONE and Human Molecular Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact