Stuart Reges

603 citations
42 papers · 482 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Stuart Reges

38 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

Stuart Reges
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Computer Science Applications 358
  • Media Technology 123
  • Software 56
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 150
  • Information Systems 107
Replace Bruria Haberman with:
Bruria Haberman Israel
Mark Stehlik United States
Michael de Raadt Australia
Doug Baldwin United States
Jonas Boustedt Sweden
Henry Leitner United States
Cynthia Selby United Kingdom
Kris Powers United States
Angela Carbone Australia
Paul Gross United States
Stuart Reges relative to Bruria Haberman Israel Bruria Haberman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Bruria Haberman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Reges

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Reges's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Reges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Reges more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Reges

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Reges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Reges. The network helps show where Stuart Reges may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stuart Reges, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stuart Reges Line = papers co-authored together Stuart Reges links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200664
2 200852
3 200541
4 200034
5 200634
6 200328
7 201726
8 200524
9 200619
10 200318
11 198817
12 198816
13
Building Java Programs: A Back to Basics Approach
200712
14 20029
15 20008
16 19998
17 20137
18 20087
19 20075
20 20165

About Stuart Reges

Stuart Reges is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Computer Networks and Communications, Media Technology, Education and Hardware and Architecture, having authored 42 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (14 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (7 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (6 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (4 papers), Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development (4 papers), Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (4 papers), Mathematics and Applications (4 papers) and Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (358 citations), Media Technology (123 citations), Software (56 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (150 citations) and Information Systems (107 citations). Stuart Reges has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Owen Astrachan, Kim B. Bruce, Elliot B. Koffman, Michael Kölling, Mehran Sahami, Eric Roberts, David J. Malan, Steven A. Wolfman, J. M. Forbes and Heather Pon-Barry. Their work appears in journals such as ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Computer, ACM Inroads, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact