Bruria Haberman

967 citations
66 papers · 633 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Bruria Haberman

61 papers receiving 553 citations

Peers

Bruria Haberman
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Computer Science Applications 525
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 257
  • Software 52
  • Media Technology 104
  • Information Systems 136
Replace Mark Stehlik with:
Mark Stehlik United States
Dennis Bouvier United States
Cynthia Selby United Kingdom
Michael de Raadt Australia
Lisa C. Kaczmarczyk United States
Jana Jacková Slovakia
Richard E. Pattis United States
William Fone United Kingdom
Morten Lindholm Denmark
David Ginat Israel
Bruria Haberman relative to Mark Stehlik United States Mark Stehlik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Mark Stehlik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bruria Haberman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bruria Haberman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bruria Haberman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bruria Haberman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bruria Haberman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bruria Haberman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bruria Haberman. The network helps show where Bruria Haberman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Bruria Haberman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bruria Haberman Line = papers co-authored together Bruria Haberman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007100
2 200338
3 200832
4 200631
5 200230
6 200429
7 200723
8 201223
9 201122
10 200421
11 200118
12 200617
13 200716
14 200516
15 200815
16 200214
17 201114
18 200614
19 200513
20 200611

About Bruria Haberman

Bruria Haberman is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Media Technology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 633 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (56 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (17 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (12 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (10 papers), Software Engineering Research (9 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (9 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (8 papers) and Online Learning and Analytics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (525 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (257 citations), Software (52 citations), Media Technology (104 citations) and Information Systems (136 citations). Bruria Haberman has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Ginat, Avi Cohen, Zahava Scherz, Yifat Ben‐David Kolikant, Valentina Dagienė, Catherine L. Reed, Helen C. Purchase, Donald Joyce, Mark Trakhtenbrot and Paul Curzon. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Science Education, International journal of engineering education, Informatics in Education, Journal of Educational Computing Research and Education and Information Technologies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact