Steve Nolan

522 citations
29 papers · 282 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Steve Nolan

21 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

Steve Nolan
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Health 205
  • Clinical Psychology 106
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 85
  • Religious studies 16
  • Applied Psychology 11
Replace Anke I. Liefbroer with:
Anke I. Liefbroer Netherlands
Annelieke Damen Netherlands
Laurel Arthur Burton United States
Stephen Duane Watkins King United States
Anne Vandenhoeck Belgium
Kenneth Texeira United States
Dorte Toudal Viftrup Denmark
Azimatul Karimah Indonesia
Vibeke Østergaard Steenfeldt Denmark
Josephine Attard Malta
Steve Nolan relative to Anke I. Liefbroer Netherlands Anke I. Liefbroer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Anke I. Liefbroer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Nolan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Nolan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Nolan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Nolan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Nolan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Nolan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Nolan. The network helps show where Steve Nolan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Steve Nolan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve Nolan Line = papers co-authored together Steve Nolan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Spiritual care in palliative care : Working towards an EAPC task force
2011148
2 201124
3 201618
4 201513
5 201912
6 200911
7 20119
8 20219
9 20118
10 20248
11 20124
12 20133
13
What every physician should know about generic drugs.
20022
14 20082
15
Opieka duchowa w opiece paliatywnej: prace nad utworzeniem Grupy Roboczej EAPC
20122
16 20122
17 20182
18 20152
19 20241
20 20061

About Steve Nolan

Steve Nolan is a scholar working on Health, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies and Philosophy, having authored 29 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (15 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (8 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (8 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (5 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (3 papers) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (205 citations), Clinical Psychology (106 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (85 citations), Religious studies (16 citations) and Applied Psychology (11 citations). Steve Nolan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Carlo J. W. Leget, George A. Fitchett, Matthew Tucker, Margaret Holloway, Adam Shore and Annelieke Damen. Their work appears in journals such as Health and Social Care Chaplaincy, Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, Palliative Medicine, Nursing Philosophy and International Journal of Public Theology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact