Health and Social Care Chaplaincy

263 papers and 715 indexed citations i.

About

The 263 papers published in Health and Social Care Chaplaincy in the last decades have received a total of 715 indexed citations. Papers published in Health and Social Care Chaplaincy usually cover Health (156 papers), Sociology and Political Science (110 papers) and Clinical Psychology (97 papers) specifically the topics of Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (156 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (85 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Health and Social Care Chaplaincy are Lindsay B. Carey, John Swinton, Steve Nolan, Mark Cobb, David Mitchell, David Hay, Daniel Nuzum, Katrina A. Bramstedt, Judith Α. Cook and Ewan Kelly.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Health and Social Care Chaplaincy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Health and Social Care Chaplaincy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Health and Social Care Chaplaincy.

Countries where authors publish in Health and Social Care Chaplaincy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Health and Social Care Chaplaincy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Health and Social Care Chaplaincy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health and Social Care Chaplaincy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025