Mary Bishop
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 5%
- Nursing education and management
- Health top 5%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Papers in
- Health 1
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 1
-
- Health and Conflict Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Rose O. Sherman (1 shared paper)Terry Eggenberger (1 shared paper)Cynthia J. Brown (1 shared paper)Lloyd H. Barrow (1 shared paper)Jennifer Walsh (1 shared paper)Thomas E. Hill (1 shared paper)Zoé Paskins (1 shared paper)Robert Horne (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Nursing Management (1 paper)JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration (1 paper)Osteoporosis International (1 paper)Holistic Nursing Practice (1 paper)Nursing Administration Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyCanada
In The Last Decade
Mary Bishop
10 papers receiving 290 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Research and Theory 35
- Health 114
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 7
- Applied Psychology 23
- Clinical Psychology 65
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Bishop
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Bishop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Bishop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Bishop. The network helps show where Mary Bishop may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Mary Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1989 | 150 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 104 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 1 |
About Mary Bishop
Mary Bishop is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 10 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Text Readability and Simplification (1 paper), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (1 paper), Health and Conflict Studies (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Religion, Society, and Development (1 paper), Academic Writing and Publishing (1 paper), Education and Islamic Studies (1 paper) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (35 citations), Health (114 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations), Applied Psychology (23 citations) and Clinical Psychology (65 citations). Mary Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rose O. Sherman, Terry Eggenberger, Cynthia J. Brown, Lloyd H. Barrow, Jennifer Walsh, Thomas E. Hill, Zoé Paskins, Robert Horne, Juliet Compston and Michael H. Stone. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nursing Management, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, Osteoporosis International, Holistic Nursing Practice and Nursing Administration Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.