Stephen T. Frezza

496 citations
59 papers · 364 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen T. Frezza

53 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

Stephen T. Frezza
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Computer Science Applications 119
  • Media Technology 61
  • Information Systems 149
  • Software 25
  • Education 134
Replace Brian R. von Konsky with:
Brian R. von Konsky Australia
Alex Radermacher United States
Sigrid E. Schubert Germany
Elizabeth Patitsas Canada
Ville Isomöttönen Finland
Chris DiGiano United States
Jocelyn Armarego Australia
Tatjana Jevsikova Lithuania
Tracy L. Lewis United States
Valentin Razmov United States
Stephen T. Frezza relative to Brian R. von Konsky Australia Brian R. von Konsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.1×
Brian R. von Konsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen T. Frezza

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen T. Frezza's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen T. Frezza with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen T. Frezza more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen T. Frezza

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen T. Frezza. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen T. Frezza. The network helps show where Stephen T. Frezza may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen T. Frezza, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen T. Frezza Line = papers co-authored together Stephen T. Frezza links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201883
2 202034
3 202025
4 201920
5 201818
6 200315
7 200914
8 201313
9 200611
10 20219
11 20209
12 19968
13 19938
14 20066
15 20125
16 19955
17 20235
18 20204
19 20174
20 20224

About Stephen T. Frezza

Stephen T. Frezza is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Information Systems, Software, Media Technology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 59 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (11 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (10 papers), Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development (9 papers), Cognitive Science and Education Research (8 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (8 papers), Software Engineering Research (7 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (7 papers) and Biomedical and Engineering Education (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (119 citations), Media Technology (61 citations), Information Systems (149 citations), Software (25 citations) and Education (134 citations). Stephen T. Frezza has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mats Daniels, Arnold Pears, Tony Clear, Mihaela Sabin, Viggo Kann, Roger McDermott, Charles Wallace, Åsa Cajander, Amanpreet Kapoor and Anne-Kathrin Peters. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Computing Education, IEEE Software, Christian Higher Education, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems and Computer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact