Stephen Schiffer

4.4k citations
69 papers · 1.6k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Schiffer

59 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Stephen Schiffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • History and Philosophy of Science 420
  • Philosophy 1.0k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.1k
  • Language and Linguistics 262
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 232
Replace Ernest Lepore with:
Ernest Lepore United States
Herman Cappelen United States
Nathan Salmón United States
Karen Bennett Portugal
Brian Loar United States
Jeffrey C. King United States
Amie L. Thomasson United States
John MacFarlane United States
George Bealer United States
Robert D. Buhr United States
Stephen Schiffer relative to Ernest Lepore United States Ernest Lepore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ernest Lepore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Schiffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Schiffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Schiffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Schiffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Schiffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Schiffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Schiffer. The network helps show where Stephen Schiffer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Schiffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Schiffer Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Schiffer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003245
2
Remnants of Meaning
1987213
3 2003189
4 1991102
5 199696
6 199275
7 197863
8 198149
9 197742
10 199539
11 199434
12 197432
13 198229
14 198729
15 199827
16 200426
17 199321
18
Basic Justification and the Moorean Response to the Skeptic
200721
19 199921
20 200220

About Stephen Schiffer

Stephen Schiffer is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, History and Philosophy of Science and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (24 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (19 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (8 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (420 citations), Philosophy (1.0k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.1k citations), Language and Linguistics (262 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (232 citations). Stephen Schiffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and France. Frequent co-authors include Gilbert Harman, Jerry A. Fodor, Huong Thi Thanh Nguyen, Stewart Cohen, Louis deRosset, Brian Weatherson, James Pryor, Timothy Williamson, Geoffrey Lee and Declan Smithies. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Noûs, Philosophical Issues, The Journal of Philosophy and Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact