Ram Neta

1.8k citations
64 papers · 944 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 60
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 8
    • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 1
    • Philosophy and Theoretical Science 13
    • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy 4

Ram Neta

59 papers receiving 717 citations

Peers

Ram Neta
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Philosophy 858
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 91
  • History and Philosophy of Science 37
  • General Decision Sciences 3
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 19
Replace Jane Friedman with:
Jane Friedman United States
Annalisa Coliva United States
John Bengson United States
Alexander Miller United Kingdom
I. G. McFetridge United Kingdom
A. W. Moore United Kingdom
Elijah Chudnoff United States
Julian Dodd United Kingdom
Joachim Horvath Germany
Sara Bernstein United States
Ram Neta relative to Jane Friedman United States Jane Friedman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.3×
Jane Friedman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ram Neta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ram Neta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ram Neta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ram Neta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ram Neta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ram Neta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ram Neta. The network helps show where Ram Neta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Ram Neta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ram Neta Line = papers co-authored together Ram Neta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004135
2 200785
3 200357
4 200256
5 200855
6 200955
7 200746
8 200641
9 201938
10 201334
11 200726
12 200922
13 200620
14 200820
15 201120
16 200317
17 200417
18 200514
19 201813
20 201812

About Ram Neta

Ram Neta is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Law, General Social Sciences and Geometry and Topology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 944 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (60 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (8 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (1 paper), Philosophy, Science, and History (1 paper) and Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (858 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (91 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (37 citations), General Decision Sciences (3 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (19 citations). Ram Neta has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Guy Rohrbaugh and Duncan Pritchard. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophical Studies, Philosophical Issues, Episteme and The Philosophical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact